Publicités

Ayn Rand présentée par Jennifer Burns

Ayn Rand 2

Jennifer Burns est professeur d’histoire des idées à Stanford et auteur de Goddess of the Market : Ayn Rand and the American Right. C’est l’universitaire aux USA qui connaît sans doute le mieux la vie et la pensée d’Ayn Rand et qui sait en parler remarquablement bien.

Les romans d’Ayn Rand, dont La Grève (Atlas Shrugged) et La Source Vive (The Fountainhead), mettent en avant l’individualisme, le rejet de la centralisation du pouvoir et l’importance des marchés libres.

La Grève (titre original : Atlas Shrugged) est le chef d’œuvre de fiction d’Ayn Rand. Dans cette vidéo, Jennifer Burns montre comment l’intrigue et les personnages de Rand illustrent le capitalisme idéal (libre marché), par opposition au capitalisme historique (crony capitalism). On peut y voir l’action d’entrepreneurs compétitifs et innovants qui sont peu à peu étranglés par des lois et des règlements, mis en place par leurs concurrents jaloux, avec la complicité des politiciens. Dans le monde de La Grève, les marchés libres et la liberté individuelle ont été échangés contre l’égalité et la sécurité, appliquées par le gouvernement. Burns termine en posant la question centrale de Rand : voulez-vous vivre dans ce genre de monde ? (vostfr) :

Jennifer Burns

Voici un entretien avec Jennifer Burns dans le Colbert Report.  L’entretien date un peu, mais j’ai retenu dans la transcription ci-dessous les éléments qui concernent spécifiquement Ayn Rand. (ouvrir la vidéo dans un nouvel onglet)

http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:arc:video:colbertnation.com:ebf9b6cd-9f2c-4c05-8f09-f180f83a8d8c

First things first, I always stumble on her name. What is the correct pronunciation of Ayn?

Here’s a good trick to remember it. In keeping with her philosophy of selfishness, “Ayn” rhymes with the word “mine.”

She was never required reading for me, but recent events underscore her influence. Is Rand someone we need to read to be culturally informed?

I do think she is someone worth familiarizing yourself with if you want to understand current political currents.

She has been sort of under the radar in American literary history. She has never been a critical favorite. She is now assigned in high schools and in some colleges, but she has never been loved by the literary establishment. People kind of discover her on their own. And one group that has always discovered her and become fascinated and even obsessed with her ideas are conservatives, particularly young conservatives.

Her discussion of the morality of capitalism comes, for many people, as this eye-opening, earth-shattering revelation that this is the way things should be. And that’s a long-running trend since the ’60s. What you saw happen in 2008 with the Tea Party was a new audience seizing upon her.

Would you recommend one particular work to get someone up to speed on Rand?

That is a tricky question because Rand was not a concise writer. Her major novels are all 500 to 1,200 pages. I think Atlas Shrugged is the most influential of her novels at this political moment, but it’s 1,200 pages long.

The shortest book of hers is called Anthem. It’s about 100 pages long but it’s a very abstract sort of science fiction story. It will give you little flavor of her but not too much.

Another one I would recommend is called The Virtue of Selfishness. This is a collection of essays along with excerpts from her fiction.

Why is the media so fascinated with Rep. As you said, conservatives have been reading her books for generations.

Rand has always been a kind of subterranean current in the conservative movement and in conservative thought.

Very few contenders for national office have made her an explicit part of their political identity because she’s very controversial in a number of ways.

Such as?

Modern-day Republicans emphasize her view on limited government and the morality of capitalism, but she was also an atheist. She was pro-abortion rights. She was antiwar. She was [for the] legalization of drugs. She staked out a lot of positions that a wise and careful politician would want to stay away from. And her fiction has some very racy, very controversial sexual passages and some pretty harsh writing.

She is very hard for politicians to embrace because not only is she not religious, she’s antireligious. The fact that Ryan gave Atlas Shrugged as a Christmas gift [to staffers] is a tremendous irony because Rand was a fire-breathing atheist. She did not believe in God. She called religion a psychological disorder. She truly believed you needed to use reason and logic and no faith whatsoever.

So what does Rand’s philosophy of objectivism boil down to?

Here is how Rand summed it up in ten words or less: “metaphysics: objective reality; epistemology: reason; ethics: self-interest; politics: capitalism.”

If I was going to break that down a little bit, metaphysics is objective reality, which means we can only rely on our mind and on reason. It’s our only guide to thought and action. Epistemology, reason. The only way we can know anything is through the reasoning mind. Ethics, self-interest. Rand claimed that selfishness was a virtue. It was virtuous to pursue your own interests and defend your own interests. And politics is capitalism because laissez-faire capitalism for her was the only system that allowed the individual to realize his or her full potential and to keep the fruits of his or her labor and not be obligated to others or punished for success.

Was she concerned about the less fortunate?

That was not a big part of her ethics. Her ethics were based on the individual and on the individual’s right to pursue his or her goals. The individual was not obligated to other people. If you chose, because of your own values, to help other people or to engage in charity, that was fine, but that did not make you a moral person. What made you a moral person is relying on yourself, pursuing your own interests, and not being a burden on others.

Some of the characters she depicts the most negatively in her novels are people like social workers. She thought social workers were [about] the most evil people possible because they made their lives on the misery of others. Morality and ethics, for her, had nothing to do with helping other people.

You wrote in the New York Times recently that she wouldn’t have approved of Paul Ryan. Why?

You have to understand how deeply Rand disliked religion and how fundamental atheism was to her thought and to her personal identity. She thought those who endorsed capitalism yet also tied it to religion were extremely dangerous. She denounced Ronald Reagan for doing that.

She almost would have preferred to deal with a politician who was very liberal or very socialist. At least you understood where that person was coming from. Someone who claimed to be a capitalist but also embraced religious conservatism or wanted to restrict certain rights because they clashed with religious beliefs—such as the right to abortion—that would be, for her, a more dangerous person, because they’re like a false friend.

What is the value of bringing Ryan’s fondness for Rand to light?

I think it is illustrative to take the social policies—and values—he’s proposed and look at their root. Their philosophical root comes from a world view that doesn’t really stop to consider the less fortunate and doesn’t really have a social vision or even a sense of anything remotely like the common good. That wasn’t a concept that Rand understood or accepted.

And so it’s absolutely worth examining. As Paul Ryan has said, Atlas Shrugged depicts the kind of world or points to the kind of vision that he wants his policies to enact. I think it’s absolutely legitimate to look and say, “What did she say, what did she believe, and where did her ideas come from,” and ask, “Is it tenable to hold these types of economic and social ideas and yet also lay claim to a Christian ethic that Rand opposed?”

jonA voir également, un entretien avec Jon Stewart (Comedy Central) :

http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:arc:video:comedycentral.com:216d0424-ed01-11e0-aca6-0026b9414f30

Publicités

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s

%d blogueurs aiment cette page :